DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Seat Alhambra vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Wagon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMitsubishi
AlhambraModelSpace Wagon
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
172 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
110 HPPower133 HP
235 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4515 mm
1810 mmWidth1695 mm
1728 mmHeight1615 mm
1754 KgWeight1351 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Seat Alhambra and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…