DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAlfa Romeo
156Model147
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
275 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4223 mm
1743 mmWidth1729 mm
1430 mmHeight1442 mm
1305 KgWeight1275 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 147 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…