DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Saturn SL vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaturnMakeMitsubishi
SLModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
126 HPPower122 HP
165 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 TTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4475 mm
1687 mmWidth1710 mm
1397 mmHeight1405 mm
1088 KgWeight1215 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Saturn SL and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…