1992 • Saturn
SL
Saturn SL 1.9 i (100 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
1992 Saturn SL vs 1992 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0 D (82 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Saturn SL
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saturn SLSpecificationMazda Cronos
SaturnMakeMazda
SLModelCronos
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Saturn SLSpecificationMazda Cronos
0 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower82 HP
155 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saturn SLSpecificationMazda Cronos
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
49 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saturn SLSpecificationMazda Cronos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 STyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saturn SLSpecificationMazda Cronos
4478 mmLength4695 mm
1718 mmWidth1770 mm
1334 mmHeight1400 mm
1054 KgWeight1260 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Saturn SL and 1992 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableAudi 100 vs Saturn SL1992 and 1992 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Prairie vs Saturn SL1992 and 1992 model years
VSImage unavailableOpel Omega vs Saturn SL1992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableDaewoo LE Mans vs Saturn SL1992 and 1992 model years
VSImage unavailableHonda Accord vs Saturn SL1992 and 1992 model yearsComments are loading…