DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Saturn SC vs 1999 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saturn SCSpecificationRover 25
SaturnMakeRover
SCModel25
1999Model year1999
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

Saturn SCSpecificationRover 25
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
100 HPPower101 HP
155 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saturn SCSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
49 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saturn SCSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14 STyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saturn SCSpecificationRover 25
4400 mmLength3990 mm
1716 mmWidth1688 mm
1286 mmHeight1419 mm
1045 KgWeight1130 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Saturn SC and 1999 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…