2003 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.9 JTD (115 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 Volvo V40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.8 GDI (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 156
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationVolvo V40
Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelV40
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationVolvo V40
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
191 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
275 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationVolvo V40
4430 mmLength4516 mm
1745 mmWidth1716 mm
1415 mmHeight1425 mm
1305 KgWeight1260 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2562 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…