DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1980 Saab 96 vs 1982 BMW 5 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 96SpecificationBMW 5 Serisi
SaabMakeBMW
96Model5 Serisi
1980Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Saab 96SpecificationBMW 5 Serisi
—0–100 km/h14,0 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
115 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 96SpecificationBMW 5 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 96SpecificationBMW 5 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
155/80 SR15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Saab 96SpecificationBMW 5 Serisi
4300 mmLength4620 mm
1590 mmWidth1700 mm
1470 mmHeight1415 mm
930 KgWeight1140 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1980 Saab 96 and 1982 BMW 5 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…