1995 • Saab
900
Saab 900 2.5 - 24 V6 (170 Hp) 1995Overall Score64.5/100
1995 Saab 900 vs 1995 Buick Skylark Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 2.3 i 16V (152 Hp) 1995Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Buick Skylark
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 900SpecificationBuick Skylark
SaabMakeBuick
900ModelSkylark
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Saab 900SpecificationBuick Skylark
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
170 HPPower152 HP
227 NmTorque196 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 900SpecificationBuick Skylark
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 900SpecificationBuick Skylark
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/60 R15Tyre size195/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 900SpecificationBuick Skylark
4637 mmLength4805 mm
1711 mmWidth1746 mm
1436 mmHeight1360 mm
1345 KgWeight1337 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2627 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Saab 900 and 1995 Buick Skylark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMitsubishi Delica vs Saab 9001995 and 1995 model yearsVSBuick Skylark vs Saab 9001995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVSMercedes-Benz E Serisi vs Saab 9001995 and 1995 model years
VSFord Scorpio vs Saab 9001995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVSBMW 7 Serisi vs Saab 9001996 and 1995 model yearsComments are loading…