1996 • Saab
900
Saab 900 2.0 - 16 Turbo (185 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Saab 900 vs 1996 Honda Orthia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Honda
Orthia
Honda Orthia 2.0i 16V (150 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Honda Orthia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 900SpecificationHonda Orthia
SaabMakeHonda
900ModelOrthia
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Saab 900SpecificationHonda Orthia
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
185 HPPower150 HP
263 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 900SpecificationHonda Orthia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 900SpecificationHonda Orthia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 900SpecificationHonda Orthia
4637 mmLength4570 mm
1711 mmWidth1700 mm
1436 mmHeight1490 mm
1330 KgWeight1170 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Saab 900 and 1996 Honda Orthia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Orthia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…