E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Saab 90 vs 1982 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 90SpecificationAudi 200
SaabMakeAudi
90Model200
1984Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Saab 90SpecificationAudi 200
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2144 cc
100 HPPower136 HP
161 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 90SpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 90SpecificationAudi 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
155/80 R15Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Saab 90SpecificationAudi 200
4344 mmLength4695 mm
1675 mmWidth1768 mm
1429 mmHeight1390 mm
955 KgWeight1260 Kg
—Wheelbase2676 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Saab 90 and 1982 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1984 Audi 100VS1984 Saab 90Audi 100 vs Saab 901984 and 1984 model years1984 Hyundai StellarVS1984 Saab 90Hyundai Stellar vs Saab 901984 and 1984 model years1984 Audi 80VS1984 Saab 90Audi 80 vs Saab 901984 and 1984 model years1984 Mercedes-Benz 190VS1984 Saab 90Mercedes-Benz 190 vs Saab 901984 and 1984 model years1984 Mercury TopazVS1984 Saab 90Mercury Topaz vs Saab 901984 and 1984 model years

Comments are loading…