DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Saab 9-5 vs 2003 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-5SpecificationFord Taurus
SaabMakeFord
9-5ModelTaurus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-5SpecificationFord Taurus
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
176 HPPower200 HP
350 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-5SpecificationFord Taurus
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-5SpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-5SpecificationFord Taurus
4805 mmLength5019 mm
1792 mmWidth1854 mm
1475 mmHeight1425 mm
1685 KgWeight1530 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Saab 9-5 and 2003 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…