2002 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 t (185 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Saab 9-5 vs 2002 SsangYong Rexton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • SsangYong
Rexton
SsangYong Rexton 2002Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
SsangYong Rexton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-5SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
SaabMakeSsangYong
9-5ModelRexton
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-5SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
185 HPPower143 HP
280 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-5SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-5SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-5SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
4827 mmLength4720 mm
1792 mmWidth1870 mm
1475 mmHeight1760 mm
1715 KgWeight1815 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2828 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-5 and 2002 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…