DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Saab 9-3 vs 2004 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
SaabMakeBMW
9-3ModelZ3
2006Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors3

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
8,0 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
245 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
250 HPPower231 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
4635 mmLength4025 mm
1762 mmWidth1740 mm
1434 mmHeight1306 mm
—Weight1305 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Saab 9-3 and 2004 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…