DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Hyundai XG Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationHyundai XG
SaabMakeHyundai
9-3ModelXG
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationHyundai XG
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
150 HPPower139 HP
210 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationHyundai XG
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationHyundai XG
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationHyundai XG
4629 mmLength4865 mm
1711 mmWidth1825 mm
1428 mmHeight1420 mm
1420 KgWeight1865 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…