DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Saab 9-3 vs 2006 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeFord
9-3ModelMaverick
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
200 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
280 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4441 mm
1762 mmWidth1825 mm
1466 mmHeight1762 mm
1610 KgWeight1530 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Saab 9-3 and 2006 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…