DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo V50
SaabMakeVolvo
9-3ModelV50
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo V50
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
125 HPPower136 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank52 lt
9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationVolvo V50
4635 mmLength4522 mm
1762 mmWidth1845 mm
1466 mmHeight1457 mm
1610 KgWeight1472 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…