2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Nissan X-Trail Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.2 dCi (114 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan X-Trail
SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelX-Trail
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan X-Trail
11,0 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
130 HPPower114 HP
177 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan X-Trail
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan X-Trail
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
185/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan X-Trail
4629 mmLength4510 mm
1711 mmWidth1765 mm
1428 mmHeight1675 mm
1295 KgWeight1534 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…