DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelAlmera
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
130 HPPower110 HP
177 NmTorque238 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4184 mm
1711 mmWidth1706 mm
1428 mmHeight1448 mm
1295 KgWeight1235 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…