DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Mazda Premacy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeMazda
9-3ModelPremacy
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
200 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower101 HP
177 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4340 mm
1711 mmWidth1710 mm
1428 mmHeight1570 mm
1295 KgWeight1380 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Mazda Premacy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…