DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Saab 9-3 vs 2001 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 626
SaabMakeMazda
9-3Model626
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 626
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
177 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 626
4629 mmLength4574 mm
1711 mmWidth1710 mm
1428 mmHeight1430 mm
1295 KgWeight1185 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Saab 9-3 and 2001 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…