2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i TS (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Nissan Wingroad Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Nissan
Wingroad
Nissan Wingroad 2.0 i 16V (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Wingroad
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Wingroad
SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelWingroad
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Wingroad
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower150 HP
283 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Wingroad
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Wingroad
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Wingroad
4629 mmLength4410 mm
1711 mmWidth1695 mm
1428 mmHeight1500 mm
1370 KgWeight1270 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Nissan Wingroad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Wingroad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…