2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i TS (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda Atenza
SaabMakeMazda
9-3ModelAtenza
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda Atenza
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower178 HP
283 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank64 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda Atenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda Atenza
4629 mmLength4745 mm
1711 mmWidth1780 mm
1428 mmHeight1440 mm
1370 KgWeight1340 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…