1999 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i TS (200 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Nissan 200 SX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
200 SX
Nissan 200 SX 2.0 i 16V Turbo (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan 200 SX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan 200 SX
SaabMakeNissan
9-3Model200 SX
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3/5Doors2
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan 200 SX
7,3 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
235 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
283 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan 200 SX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan 200 SX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan 200 SX
4629 mmLength4560 mm
1711 mmWidth1730 mm
1428 mmHeight1295 mm
1370 KgWeight1350 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Nissan 200 SX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan 200 SX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…