DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Saab 9-3 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeOpel
9-3ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
175 HPPower165 HP
265 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank56 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4696 mm
1762 mmWidth1839 mm
1466 mmHeight1443 mm
1440 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Saab 9-3 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…