DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZT
SaabMakeMG
9-3ModelZT
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZT
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
122 HPPower116 HP
167 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZT
4635 mmLength4740 mm
1762 mmWidth1780 mm
1466 mmHeight1410 mm
1380 KgWeight1535 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2005 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…