DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
SaabMakeMG
9-3ModelZR
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
122 HPPower117 HP
167 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
4635 mmLength4011 mm
1762 mmWidth1690 mm
1466 mmHeight1400 mm
1380 KgWeight1070 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2005 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…