2004 • Saab
9-2X
Saab 9-2X 2.5i 16V (173 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
2004 Saab 9-2X vs 2005 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5i (173Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-2X
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-2XSpecificationSubaru Forester
SaabMakeSubaru
9-2XModelForester
2004Model year2005
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-2XSpecificationSubaru Forester
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
173 HPPower173 HP
225 NmTorque229 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-2XSpecificationSubaru Forester
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Saab 9-2XSpecificationSubaru Forester
4460 mmLength4450 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1465 mmHeight1585 mm
1395 KgWeight1455 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Saab 9-2X and 2005 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-2X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…