DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Rover Montego vs 1986 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Montego

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
MontegoModelSierra
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
175 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 HR14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4425 mm
1710 mmWidth1694 mm
1420 mmHeight1407 mm
1115 KgWeight1600 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Rover Montego and 1986 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Montego leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…