DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover Mini MK vs 1998 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
Mini MKModelEscort
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
148 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
63 HPPower60 HP
95 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4104 mm
1440 mmWidth1691 mm
1350 mmHeight1398 mm
700 KgWeight1005 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover Mini MK and 1998 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…