DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover Mini MK vs 1996 Lada 2108 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLada
Mini MKModel2108
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
148 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1288 cc
63 HPPower65 HP
95 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size165/70 SR13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4006 mm
1440 mmWidth1650 mm
1350 mmHeight1402 mm
700 KgWeight900 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover Mini MK and 1996 Lada 2108 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…