DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover Mini MK vs 1994 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeVolkswagen
Mini MKModelPolo
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
140 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1274 ccEngine displacement1272 cc
50 HPPower55 HP
89 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength3765 mm
1410 mmWidth1570 mm
1350 mmHeight1350 mm
645 KgWeight780 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover Mini MK and 1994 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…