DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover Mini MK vs 1994 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeVolkswagen
Mini MKModelPolo
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h18,1 s
148 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1716 cc
63 HPPower60 HP
95 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4137 mm
1440 mmWidth1640 mm
1351 mmHeight1433 mm
700 KgWeight1090 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2444 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover Mini MK and 1994 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…