DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover Mini MK vs 1992 Ford Fiesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
Mini MKModelFiesta
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
148 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
63 HPPower60 HP
95 NmTorque101 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength3743 mm
1440 mmWidth1606 mm
1351 mmHeight1379 mm
700 KgWeight855 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover Mini MK and 1992 Ford Fiesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…