DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover Mini MK vs 1992 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
Mini MKModelEscort
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h16,1 s
148 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1392 cc
63 HPPower73 HP
95 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4268 mm
1440 mmWidth1690 mm
1351 mmHeight1410 mm
700 KgWeight1095 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover Mini MK and 1992 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…