DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover Mini MK vs 1995 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeVolkswagen
Mini MKModelGolf
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
143 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1391 cc
53 HPPower55 HP
92 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4020 mm
1440 mmWidth1695 mm
1351 mmHeight1425 mm
700 KgWeight1030 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover Mini MK and 1995 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…