DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover Mini MK vs 1995 Fiat UNO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFiat
Mini MKModelUNO
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
143 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
53 HPPower57 HP
92 NmTorque87 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size155/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3100 mmLength3690 mm
1440 mmWidth1560 mm
1351 mmHeight1420 mm
700 KgWeight760 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover Mini MK and 1995 Fiat UNO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…