DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover Mini MK vs 1994 Ford Fiesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
Mini MKModelFiesta
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h18,6 s
143 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1118 cc
53 HPPower55 HP
92 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size155/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3100 mmLength3743 mm
1440 mmWidth1606 mm
1351 mmHeight1379 mm
700 KgWeight845 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover Mini MK and 1994 Ford Fiesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…