DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover Mini MK vs 1989 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLada
Mini MKModel2106
1990Model year1989
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
148 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1569 cc
61 HPPower75 HP
91 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank39 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
145/70 R12Tyre size175/70 SR13

Dimensions

3050 mmLength4166 mm
1410 mmWidth1611 mm
1350 mmHeight1440 mm
695 KgWeight1035 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover Mini MK and 1989 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…