DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover MGF vs 1998 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLand Rover
MGFModelFreelander
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
212 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
145 HPPower120 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3913 mmLength4382 mm
1628 mmWidth1805 mm
1264 mmHeight1760 mm
1060 KgWeight1380 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover MGF and 1998 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…