DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover MGF vs 1995 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover MGFSpecificationBMW Z3
RoverMakeBMW
MGFModelZ3
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Rover MGFSpecificationBMW Z3
7,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
212 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
145 HPPower115 HP
174 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover MGFSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover MGFSpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover MGFSpecificationBMW Z3
3913 mmLength4025 mm
1628 mmWidth1692 mm
1264 mmHeight1288 mm
1060 KgWeight1160 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover MGF and 1995 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…