DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover MGF vs 1998 Seat Leon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover MGFSpecificationSeat Leon
RoverMakeSeat
MGFModelLeon
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Rover MGFSpecificationSeat Leon
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover MGFSpecificationSeat Leon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover MGFSpecificationSeat Leon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover MGFSpecificationSeat Leon
3913 mmLength4184 mm
1628 mmWidth1742 mm
1464 mmHeight1457 mm
1060 KgWeight1297 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover MGF and 1998 Seat Leon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…