DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Rover Maestro vs 1992 Lancia Delta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLancia
MaestroModelDelta
1993Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
60 HPPower90 HP
121 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 SR14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4000 mmLength—
1690 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1095 KgWeight1005 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Rover Maestro and 1992 Lancia Delta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…