DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover Maestro vs 1992 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeToyota
MaestroModel4runner
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h22,0 s
150 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
60 HPPower90 HP
121 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption15 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 SR14Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4490 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1430 mmHeight1745 mm
1095 KgWeight1750 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover Maestro and 1992 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…