DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover Maestro vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeAudi
MaestroModel80
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
167 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
86 HPPower75 HP
132 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 86 HTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4482 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1408 mm
975 KgWeight1355 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover Maestro and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…