DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1985 Rover Maestro vs 1985 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeAudi
MaestroModel100
1985Model year1985
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h17,9 s
167 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
86 HPPower70 HP
132 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 86 HTyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4793 mm
1690 mmWidth1814 mm
1430 mmHeight1422 mm
975 KgWeight1210 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1985 Rover Maestro and 1985 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…