1995 • Rover
Maestro
Rover Maestro 1.3 (69 Hp) 1995Overall Score46.25/100
1995 Rover Maestro vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 1.3 (103 A) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Zastava Yugo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover MaestroSpecificationZastava Yugo
RoverMakeZastava
MaestroModelYugo
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Rover MaestroSpecificationZastava Yugo
12,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
154 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1290 cc
69 HPPower68 HP
102 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover MaestroSpecificationZastava Yugo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover MaestroSpecificationZastava Yugo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
155/80 R13 79 TTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover MaestroSpecificationZastava Yugo
4000 mmLength3930 mm
1695 mmWidth1660 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
925 KgWeight910 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Rover Maestro and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…