DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover 800 vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 800

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 800SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
800Model80
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 800SpecificationAudi 80
8,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
220 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower140 HP
216 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 800SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 800SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 800SpecificationAudi 80
4882 mmLength4482 mm
1730 mmWidth1695 mm
1393 mmHeight1406 mm
1395 KgWeight1270 Kg
2766 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover 800 and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 800 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…