DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 75 vs 2004 Nissan Altima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeNissan
75ModelAltima
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
177 HPPower175 HP
240 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4747 mmLength4860 mm
1778 mmWidth1790 mm
1424 mmHeight1470 mm
1445 KgWeight1350 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 75 and 2004 Nissan Altima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…