2002 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.5 V6 (177 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Rover 75
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationOpel Omega
RoverMakeOpel
75ModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationOpel Omega
8,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
220 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationOpel Omega
4747 mmLength4898 mm
1778 mmWidth1775 mm
1424 mmHeight1450 mm
1445 KgWeight1610 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Rover 75 and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…