1999 • Rover
75
Rover 75 2.5 V6 (177 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
1999 Rover 75 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Legnum
Mitsubishi Legnum 2.5i ST (175 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Legnum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
RoverMakeMitsubishi
75ModelLegnum
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower175 HP
240 NmTorque222 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R16V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 75SpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
4747 mmLength4740 mm
1778 mmWidth1760 mm
1424 mmHeight1470 mm
1445 KgWeight1550 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Rover 75 and 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…